Home
 Search
 Email

 2005
 2004
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2000
 A - Z
 Classics
 Star Rating
 Top 10 Lists
 Top 200 All-Time
 Top Directors
 Commentary

 IMDb
 MRQE
 OFCS
 Film Critics
.
.
Ben-Hur      1925 Review by Jonathan Cornwell
Directed by Fred Niblo
NR, 143 min.
Starring: Ramon Novarro, Francis X. Bushman, May McAvoy, Betty Bronson, Claire McDowell, Kathleen Key, Carmel Myers, Nigel De Brulier, Mitchell Lewis, Leo White, Frank Currier
Producers: J.J. Cohn, Charles B. Dillingham, Abraham L. Erlanger, Louis B. Mayer
Screenplay: June Mathis, Bess Meredyth, Carey Wilson
Cinematography: Clyde De Vinna, René Guissart, P. Hilburn
Distributor: MGM
Released: 12.30.25
Rating  (out of )

Ben-Hur was maybe the first true blockbuster in cinematic history. With a cost of around $4 million (almost $100 million today), the film had to be a success, and it was. The newly merged Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer was elevated to major player after its release in 1925 as audiences flocked to see what took years to make. A nice story combined with groundbreaking action sequences, including a jaw-dropping sea battle and a now classic chariot race, make Ben-Hur one of the most popular films of the silent era. Although not quite a masterpiece, director Fred Niblo - in the defining project of his career - was able to create a spectacle of action and storytelling that held the viewer's attention for the film's entire running length.

Most current movie enthusiasts would point to Charlton Heston's 1959 re-make as the definitive Ben-Hur; however, from a technical standpoint, the 1925 version is clearly superior. One could argue Heston's performance is better than Novarro's (I would not), but the grand nature of the stunts and unparalled coordination during shoots at a time when nothing of its kind had been attempted before gives this version a more authentic and powerful feel than the '59 effort. In fact, because most audiences have never seen this version (probably because it's a silent film and not readily accessible), the film is one of the more overlooked gems of the 1920s. There's something special about the look of this film - not only because it's black and white picture provides a poignant foundation to build upon - that makes each character seem larger than life.

Judah Ben-Hur (Ramon Novarro) is a wealthy Jew whose mother (Claire McDowell) and sister (Kathleen Key) have been sent away to rot in a prison while he becomes a slave to the Roman empire after false charges against his family. After saving a Roman fleet commander (Frank Currier) during a bloody sea battle, he's is elevated to the hero of Rome and becomes a great chariot racer. But his quest to find his mother and sister drive him to leave his position of power and begin his search. He eventually finds himself in Antioch, where he finally confronts his nemesis Messala (Francis X. Bushman), the Roman soldier who betrayed his family, in a great chariot race. Once avenged, he turns to help the newfound King of the Jews, Jesus Christ, conquer the Romans with two legions under his command. However, once he encounters Christ, his heart is changed and he once again becomes a peaceful man when Christ heals his mother and sister from leprosy.

The film is also entitled A Tale of the Christ, since parts of Jesus' life are interwoven into Ben-Hur's own story. Christ's pivotal scenes in the film are shot in technicolor, a surely startling revelation in 1925, but we never see His face. Instead, hands, arms, and printed words give us the impression of Christ's handiwork. The scenes shot in color are well done, and they help to make these pictures stand out from the rest of the film.

The countless problems encountered during the film's production are legendary. Originally slated to be shot entirely in Italy and nearby seas, the film quickly went over budget and the prints sent back to the U.S. were unusable. After catastrophic incidents, including the deaths of extras during the filming of the sea battle, the studio quickly moved the entire production back to California, where Novarro was given the lead role and Niblo took over the director's chair. The result was a riveting picture that proved to Hollywood that big budget films could be very profitable.

The performances in the film are top-notch. Novarro's sturdy frame and good looks, coupled with dark, mysterious eyes, gives him a depth to Ben-Hur that makes the need for words unnecessary - it's obvious what his every thought is throughout every scene. In fact, his performance was so loved that he replaced Rudolph Valentino as the screen's greatest idol shortly after its release. Bushman's character oozes sinister and evil underpinnings, making his effort surprising considering his roles in previous films were heroes and leading men.

Had the Academy Awards existed in 1926, Ben-Hur would have surely garnered several Oscars, since the 1959 version racked up eleven Oscars in 1960. There would have been great competition from another sensational film, The Big Parade, but due to its epic nature Ben-Hur probably would have won Best Picture. I would rate The Big Parade slighty higher than Ben-Hur overall due to its captivating war sequences, but it's very close. Grandiose and mesmerizing, Ben-Hur is a film worth seeking out.

© 2002 Jonathan Cornwell



Masterpiece - Film perfection
Excellent - A Must See
Good - Highly Recommended
Fair - Worth seeing
Average - Viewable, but not recommended
Below average - View at own risk
Poor - Avoid at all costs
Very poor - An embarassment to the film industry
Zero
Awful - One of the worst films ever made


© 2000 - present ReelCriticReviews
All movie pictures are registered trademarks and/or copyrights of their respective holders
Their use on this site is for informational purposes only and does not imply ownership