Home
 Search
 Email

 2005
 2004
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2000
 A - Z
 Classics
 Star Rating
 Top 10 Lists
 Top 200 All-Time
 Top Directors
 Commentary

 IMDb
 MRQE
 OFCS
 Film Critics
.
.
Calendar Girls      2003 Review by Jonathan Cornwell
Directed by Nigel Cole
PG-13, 108 min.
(nudity, some language, drug-related material)
Starring: Helen Mirren, Julie Walters, Penelope Wilton, Celia Imrie, Annette Crosby, Linda Bassett, Geraldine James, Ciaran Hinds, John Alderton
Producers: Nick Barton, Suzanne Mackie
Screenplay: Tim Firth, Juliette Towhidi
Cinematography: Ashley Rowe
Distributor: Touchstone Pictures
Released: 12.19.03 (Limited), 1.02.04 (Wide)
Rating:    (out of )

Based on the true story of a group of middle-aged British women posing semi-nude for a calendar shoot, Calendar Girls finds just enough humor and sweet-natured intentions to satisfy most viewers. Much in the tradition of the surprise hit The Full Monty, this film, directed by Nigel Cole, capitalizes on the risqué sensibilities of English society, which under normal circumstances would frown upon such shenanigans. Although not as inspired as The Full Monty, Calendar Girls has the benefit of talent that Helen Mirren and Julie Walters bring to the screen, even if the screenplay has some manipulative tendencies. Their infectious spirit in the production spreads through the rest of the picture like a mild attack of the laughter bug. The film is simply too fun to dismiss.

Best friends Chris Harper (Helen Mirren) and Annie Clarke (Julie Walters) employ the local talents - fellow members (Celia (Celia Imrie), Jessie (Annette Crosby), and Cora (Linda Bassett)) of their local chapter of the Women's Institute - to fill the pages of a pin-up calendar, which is motivated by Annie's desire to raise money for the fight against cancer (her husband John passes away of leukemia early in the picture) and the local hospital's need for a new sofa (for which family members can rest while awaiting their loved ones during cancer treatment sessions). Of course, there is resistance. The president (Geraldine James) of their chapter is apalled by the idea, and their family members are wary of the publicity and possible embarassment. But that doesn't stop them, employing a photographer and proceeding to pose nude strategically behind an assortment of desserts and kitchen items for the pictures. An instant success, the now famed "calendar girls" are swept away by national attention and a trip to Hollywood to appear on the "The Tonight Show" with Jay Leno. Meanwhile, Chris' husband (Ciaran Hinds) and son are suffering through neglect, and some of the other women's families have problems of their own.

This seems to be the film's major weakness, that screenwriters Tim Firtha and Juliette Towhidi felt forced to include melodramatic undercurrents to a film that in reality had no real obstacles to overcome. But, according to screenwriting 101, uplifting stories such as this require a hint of conflict in order to make the eventual triumph fully satisfying. The final parts of the film become draining and unnecessary, as if the controversy was manufactured only to add disjointed weight to the picture. To be fair, Cole and his filmmakers do an admirable job of keeping things running smoothly despite a few rough spots.

Calendar Girls works because it tantalizes on the idea of women over 50 taking their clothes off, even if for only a modest amount of skin. The viewer, especially those in the target audience (women in their fifties), can relate to the fear of stage fright at the most intimate level. Even in front of friends and a responsible photographer, nudity can be an unnerving experience. That the women of Yorkshire, whose, according to the departed John, "last stage is the most glorious," tap into the female empowerment is not so much a matter of choice as it is a necessity to feel alive beyond the mundane exercise of daily routine.

© 2003 Jonathan Cornwell



Masterpiece - Film perfection
Excellent - A Must See
Good - Highly Recommended
Fair - Worth seeing
Average - Viewable, but not recommended
Below average - View at own risk
Poor - Avoid at all costs
Very poor - An embarassment to the film industry
Zero
Awful - One of the worst films ever made


© 2000 - present ReelCriticReviews
All movie pictures are registered trademarks and/or copyrights of their respective holders
Their use on this site is for informational purposes only and does not imply ownership