Home
 Search
 Email

 2005
 2004
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2000
 A - Z
 Classics
 Star Rating
 Top 10 Lists
 Top 200 All-Time
 Top Directors
 Commentary

 IMDb
 MRQE
 OFCS
 Film Critics
.
.
Lagaan      2001 Review by Jonathan Cornwell
Directed by Ashutosh Gowariker
PG, 220 min.
(profanity, mild violence)
Starring: Aamir Khan, Gracy Singh, Rachel Shelley, Paul Blackthorne, Suhasini Mulay, Kulbhushan Kharbanda, Raghuvir Yadav, Rajendra Gupta, Rajesh Vivek, Shri Vallabh Vyas, Javed Khan, Raj Zutshi, Akhilendra Mishra, Pradeep Rawat, Daya Shankar Pandey, Yashpal Sharma, Amin Hajee
Producer: Aamir Khan
Screenplay: Kumar Dave, Sanjay Dayma, A. Gowariker
Distributor: Sony Pictures Classics
Released: 6/15/01 (Limited)
(In Hindi with English subtitles)
Rating  (out of )

Lagaan, recently nominated for Best Foreign Picture by the Academy, is a charming if too long film from India that at its heart is really just another version of The Bad News Bears. It's part musical, part sports epic, and part commentary on the injustices of British imperialism. Althouth India has had its share of quality films, it seems strange that this particular endeavor would be nominated for an Oscar considering how peculiar a film it is. I use the word peculiar because Lagaan flirts with several genres before settling on the classic underdog scenario much in the tradition of Hoosiers or Major League. However, unlike those films, the stakes are a bit higher considering the poor farmers involved in the story could lose everything.

The British are engaged in heavy taxing of provinces in 1893 India. They require Lagaan, or a land tax, from every farmer each year. The tax has become a terrible burden on the people, whose only reward is the safety provided by the British army from local violent nomads. In one particular province, the locals are led by Bhuvan (Aamir Khan), whose rebellious attitude has resulted in a challenge from the British captain, Russell (Paul Blackthrone), to settle the tax burden with a game of cricket. If Bhuvan and his village can defeat the well-trained British team, there will be no lagaan for three years. However, if they lose, their lagaan will be tripled for the current year, more or less ensuring their starvation. Bhuvan's village, at first outraged by his arrogant acceptance of the bet, slowly begin to realize their opportunity and begin learning the game from Russell's beautiful sister, Elizabeth (Rachel Shelley), who takes a fancy to Bhuvan. Between learning the game and preparing for the match, Bhuvan must balance his relationship with his village, his girlfriend Gauri (Gracy Singh), and Elizabeth. His chosen team is made up of various villagers with certain skills that befit their position in cricket. However, defeating the British will take a supreme effort from Bhuvan himself if the village is to be saved.

American audiences will probably appreciate the musical numbers that interrupt the story throughout the film. They're flashy, mostly over-the-top numbers in the tradition of Moulin Rouge, but add a layer of entertainment to a sometimes sluggish script. Lagaan is beautifully-filmed, with many shots of the dusty, sun-soaked desert ever-present in almost every frame. The conditions of the villagers are obviously poor, yet their happiness comes from the comaraderie and close-knit ties made possible by an open community. They have simple lives and wouldn't have it any other way.

Lagaan's greatest strength comes from its ability to surprise. At first, it seems the film will take on a historical epic approach, until suddenly music and singing is in the air. It concludes with the aforementioned cricket match, which is interesting and educational, but way too long. In fact, the match itself runs over an hour and a half long. Despite its length, the match is meticulously-crafted to squeeze every ounce of suspense possible from such a game. Although the outcome seems predictable, there are several moments when you're not quite sure what will happen, which is the sign of intelligent filmmaking. Lagaan is a good film, recommended, but the simple fact that it runs almost four hours long (if you include the intermission and restroom breaks) will invariably intimidate many viewers from seeing it. But for those who do, it doesn't disappoint.

© 2002 Jonathan Cornwell


Masterpiece - Film perfection
Excellent - A Must See
Good - Highly Recommended
Fair - Worth seeing
Average - Viewable, but not recommended
Below average - View at own risk
Poor - Avoid at all costs
Very poor - An embarassment to the film industry
Zero
Awful - One of the worst films ever made


© 2000 - present ReelCriticReviews
All movie pictures are registered trademarks and/or copyrights of their respective holders
Their use on this site is for informational purposes only and does not imply ownership