Home
 Search
 Email

 2005
 2004
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2000
 A - Z
 Classics
 Star Rating
 Top 10 Lists
 Top 200 All-Time
 Top Directors
 Commentary

 IMDb
 MRQE
 OFCS
 Film Critics
.
.
The Man on the Train      2002 Review by Jonathan Cornwell
Directed by Patrice Leconte
R, 90 min.
(some language, brief violence)
Starring: Jean Rochefort, Johnny Hallyday, Charlie Nelson, Pascal Parmentier, Jean-Francois Stevenin, Isabelle Petit-Jacques
Producer: Philippe Carcassonne
Screenplay: Claude Klotz
Cinematography: Jean-Marie Dreujou
Distributor: Paramount Classics
Released: 5.09.03 (Limited)
(In French with subtitles)
Rating:    (out of )

French director Patrice Leconte's latest film, The Man on the Train, continues his penchant for making intimate films about people who relish the differences in others in order to better understand the world they live in. Here, two older men find an unlikely and close friendship in the wake of life-altering events. One man, Manesquier (Jean Rochefort), a retired literature teacher, is scheduled for triple bypass surgery; the other, Milan (Johnny Hallyday), an old bank robber, is in town to stick up the local bank. They meet by chance at a local drug store, and soon Manesquier has offered his modest home as shelter for Milan, who finds the small town's hotel closed. Although they have only a few days together, the men find solace in each other's company, engaging in witty conversations and playful banter about their disparate lives. Milan craves the tranquility and mentoring aspects of Manesquier's life, while Manesquier craves the dangerous, adventurous spirit that Milan has utilized for his criminal profession. They're two souls yearning for change at an age that normally defies the possibility.

Leconte, who is responsible for wonderful films like The Widow of St. Pierre and Girl on the Bridge, shows a great patience and elegance in his direction that many of today's younger directors don't understand. His scenes eschew melodrama for the everyday qualities that most people can identify with. His characters talk at length, usually about simple things, with an intelligence and insightfulness that underscores their experienced lives. This film, written by Claude Klotz, emphasizes the weather-beaten lives of Milan and Manesquier, who experience one final poignant moment before their fateful journey ends in bittersweet irony. Leconte focuses the two men's distinctive lives at their intersection, at a time when, fate it seems, intervenes. He uses their mutual desire for change as the means for his introspective, quiet film.

Rochefort, the venerable actor, and Hallyday, a French rock star, are perfectly cast as opposites that attract. Leconte uses their diverse backgrounds to good measure here, with both bringing real-life sensibility to their roles. The underlying humor inherent in such a pairing is also palpable; Manesquier tries on Milan's leather jacket and learns to shoot a gun, while Milan discusses the intracacies art and poetry with Manesquier while gazing at the stars. Their conversations are deep yet superficial in nature, and they both understand the importance of silence, even though Manesquier would like to converse some more.

The Man on the Train is about male friendship and how chemistry can develop quickly despite unlikely circumstances. That Leconte takes the time to portray that friendship with the detailed concentration necessary to make the film interesting is a testament to his effective directorial style, which complements his actors and elevates even mundane subject matter.

© 2003 Jonathan Cornwell



Masterpiece - Film perfection
Excellent - A Must See
Good - Highly Recommended
Fair - Worth seeing
Average - Viewable, but not recommended
Below average - View at own risk
Poor - Avoid at all costs
Very poor - An embarassment to the film industry
Zero
Awful - One of the worst films ever made


© 2000 - present ReelCriticReviews
All movie pictures are registered trademarks and/or copyrights of their respective holders
Their use on this site is for informational purposes only and does not imply ownership